1#@!#!123s

: / home / diafrica / tmp / horde / .horde / imp / compose /
Filename : 5f5237c6-12e0-4bde-b0a6-1e9b68986ff1
back
Envelope-to: farinola@dominicaninstitute.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:56:53 -0800
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:56:11 +0100
To: aaf936@student.bham.ac.uk
From: DH2020 Program Committee <dh2020@conftool.pro>
Cc: farinola@dominicaninstitute.org, austineaf@gmail.com
Reply-To: pc2020@adho.org
Subject: DH2020 Reviewing is Now Open: Deadline 15 December
Message-ID: <cb1b7d7eef303e9fdd4b79b68987d34f@www.conftool.pro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="b1_cb1b7d7eef303e9fdd4b79b68987d34f"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--b1_cb1b7d7eef303e9fdd4b79b68987d34f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear Augustine Farinola, 
 
The following 4 submissions were recently assigned to you for reviewing for "Digital Humanities 2020": 
 
Review 1 
ID       : 216 
Type     : Panel 
Title    : Global Renderings in the Queer Digital Humanities 
Author(s): Barnett, Tully; Cytron, Megan; Gairola, Rahul; Sumner, Tyne Daile

 
Review 2 
ID       : 495 
Type     : Long Presentation 
Title    : Topics, buckets, networks and psychiatry. On the collective creation of a corpus exploration tool 
Author(s): Biryukov, Maria; Kalyakin, Roman; Andersen, Eva; Wieneke, Lars

 
Review 3 
ID       : 533 
Type     : Panel 
Title    : Sustainability in the Making and Knowing Project: From Scholarly Edition to Community Crossroads 
Author(s): Smith, Pamela H.; Laiacona, Nick; Catapano, Terry; Rosenkranz, Naomi; Uchacz, Tianna Helena; Godbarge, Clement; Taape, Tillmann

 
Review 4 
ID       : 591 
Type     : Short Presentation 
Title    : How Bisexual+ Community Members Tweet about Health: A Community-Informed, Topic Modeling Approach to Characterizing Under-Reported Health Needs of LGBTQ Twitter Users 
Author(s): Lundy, Morgan; Webb, Frank; Karami, Amir

 


 
As you review, please keep in mind the following:


*  This year, peer review will be open, which means that reviewer and submitter names will be visible to each other, but are not meant to be shared publicly. We are working to ensure rigorous and professional review standards.

*  Reviews will be held to the standards outlined in the Code of Conduct: <https://dh2020.adho.org/code-of-conduct/>

*  If you need to recuse yourself from a review for any reason, we will be happy to accommodate that request. You need only select the conflict of interest option and we will reassign the review.

*  Reviewer guidelines, including the review criteria and how to review by submission type, are here: <https://dh2020.adho.org/reviewer-guidelines/>

*  Please note that the reviewer guidelines do not penalize submissions based on length, but do require all submissions to show "explicit engagement with relevant scholarship, with references"; (references can be in any format at this stage, including naming other projects or scholars in the text of the submission)

*  Please make sure when you review to view the full submission including any attachments, not just the submission abstract.


Additionally, if you have not yet accepted the Conference Code of Conduct and the Data Privacy Policy for the conference, you will be prompted to do so upon logging into Conftool.


During the review period, you may be asked to review one or two additional submissions. We will notify you if that occurs.


If you have any questions or concerns regarding reviewing or your review assignments, please email pc2020@adho.org with DH2020 Review in the subject line.


 
Thank you for your service to DH2020 
The Program Committee of DH2020. 
 
-- 
Digital Humanities Conference 2020 
https://dh2020.adho.org/ 
https://www.conftool.pro/dh2020/


--b1_cb1b7d7eef303e9fdd4b79b68987d34f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<style><!--
 body { background: #fff; color: #000; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; margin: 2px;}
 p,td,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,ul,ol,li { font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; margin: 0 0 2px 2px;}
 .fontmonospaced { font-family: Consolas, "Lucida Sans Typewriter", "Lucida Console", Monaco, Menlo, "Droid Sans Mono", monospace; line-height: 120%; font-size: 9pt; }
--> </style>
</head>

<body >

<p>Dear Augustine Farinola, 
<br />
<br />The following 4 submissions were recently assigned to you for reviewing for "Digital Humanities 2020": 
<br /><p>
<br />Review 1
<br />ID&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : 216
<br />Type&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : Panel
<br />Title&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;: Global Renderings in the Queer Digital Humanities
<br />Author(s): Barnett, Tully; Cytron, Megan; Gairola, Rahul; Sumner, Tyne Daile
</p><p>
<br />Review 2
<br />ID&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : 495
<br />Type&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : Long Presentation
<br />Title&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;: Topics, buckets, networks and psychiatry. On the collective creation of a corpus exploration tool
<br />Author(s): Biryukov, Maria; Kalyakin, Roman; Andersen, Eva; Wieneke, Lars
</p><p>
<br />Review 3
<br />ID&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : 533
<br />Type&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : Panel
<br />Title&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;: Sustainability in the Making and Knowing Project: From Scholarly Edition to Community Crossroads
<br />Author(s): Smith, Pamela H.; Laiacona, Nick; Catapano, Terry; Rosenkranz, Naomi; Uchacz, Tianna Helena; Godbarge, Clement; Taape, Tillmann
</p><p>
<br />Review 4
<br />ID&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : 591
<br />Type&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : Short Presentation
<br />Title&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;: How Bisexual+ Community Members Tweet about Health: A Community-Informed, Topic Modeling Approach to Characterizing Under-Reported Health Needs of LGBTQ Twitter Users
<br />Author(s): Lundy, Morgan; Webb, Frank; Karami, Amir
</p><p>
<br />
</p> 
<br />As you review, please keep in mind the following:
</p><ul><li>This year, peer review will be open, which means that reviewer and submitter names will be visible to each other, but are not meant to be shared publicly. We are working to ensure rigorous and professional review standards.</li>
<li>Reviews will be held to the standards outlined in the Code of Conduct: <a href="https://dh2020.adho.org/code-of-conduct/">https://dh2020.adho.org/code-of-conduct/</a></li>
<li>If you need to recuse yourself from a review for any reason, we will be happy to accommodate that request. You need only select the conflict of interest option and we will reassign the review.</li>
<li>Reviewer guidelines, including the review criteria and how to review by submission type, are here: <a href="https://dh2020.adho.org/reviewer-guidelines/">https://dh2020.adho.org/reviewer-guidelines/</a></li>
<li>Please note that the reviewer guidelines do not penalize submissions based on length, but do require all submissions to show "explicit engagement with relevant scholarship, with references"; (references can be in any format at this stage, including naming other projects or scholars in the text of the submission)</li>
<li>Please make sure when you review to view the full submission including any attachments, not just the submission abstract.</li>
</ul><p>Additionally, if you have not yet accepted the Conference Code of Conduct and the Data Privacy Policy for the conference, you will be prompted to do so upon logging into Conftool.
</p><p>During the review period, you may be asked to review one or two additional submissions. We will notify you if that occurs.
</p><p>If you have any questions or concerns regarding reviewing or your review assignments, please email pc2020@adho.org with DH2020 Review in the subject line.
</p><p>
<br />Thank you for your service to DH2020 
<br />The Program Committee of DH2020.
<br />
<br />-- 
<br />Digital Humanities Conference 2020 
<br />https://dh2020.adho.org/ 
<br />https://www.&#x63;&#x6F;&#x6E;&#x66;&#x74;&#x6F;&#x6F;&#x6C;&#x2E;&#x70;&#x72;&#x6F;/dh2020/
</p></body></html>



--b1_cb1b7d7eef303e9fdd4b79b68987d34f--