1#@!#!123s

: / home / diafrica / tmp / horde / .horde / imp / compose /
Filename : 5f5237c7-048c-4754-b826-1e9b68986ff1
back
Envelope-to: farinola@dominicaninstitute.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:38:48 -0800
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 02:38:06 +0100
To: aaf936@student.bham.ac.uk
From: DH2020 Conference Chairs <dh2020@conftool.pro>
Cc: farinola@dominicaninstitute.org, austineaf@gmail.com
Reply-To: pc2020@adho.org
Subject: DH2020: New Review Submitted. Contribution ID: 591
Message-ID: <2c025909a8fd5ef5601a057a0579e94d@www.conftool.pro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="b1_2c025909a8fd5ef5601a057a0579e94d"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--b1_2c025909a8fd5ef5601a057a0579e94d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear Mr. Augustine Farinola,

Your review for contribution 591, title:<br />"How Bisexual+ Community Members Tweet about Health: A Community-Informed, Topic Modeling Approach to Characterizing Under-Reported Health Needs of LGBTQ Twitter Users" was saved.


Evaluation of the Contribution
------------------------------
Overall organization and clarity of proposed submission  (20%): 4
Explicit Engagement                                      (30%): 6
Thematic relevance                                       (10%): 6
Statement of Purpose and Framework                       (20%): 7
Contribution                                             (20%): 6
Total points (out of 100)                                     : 58


Comments for the Authors
------------------------
The authors listed a lot of things they intend doing but unable to show evidence of how they would achieve that. The clarity of purpose in this research is obvious, but the methodology is questionable. I would advice that the authors should reduce their research objectives and give a detailed description of the tools to be used for their data mining.  I strongly believe that a sentiment analysis using social media as the source of data requires some procedure to be able to defend the validity of one&#39;s finding.




Best,
Your DH2020 organizers.

-- 
Digital Humanities Conference 2020
https://dh2020.adho.org/
https://www.conftool(dot)pro/dh2020/


--b1_2c025909a8fd5ef5601a057a0579e94d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<style><!--
 body, tt { font-family: Consolas, "Lucida Sans Typewriter", "Lucida Console", Monaco, Menlo, "Droid Sans Mono", "Andale Mono", monospace; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 120%; }
 body { background: #fff; color: #000; margin: 2px; }
 tt { margin: 0 0 2px 0;}
 a { color: #0044cc; }
--> </style>
</head>

<body >
<tt>Dear Mr. Augustine Farinola,<br />
<br />
Your review for contribution 591, title:<br />"How Bisexual+ Community Members Tweet about Health: A Community-Informed, Topic Modeling Approach to Characterizing Under-Reported Health Needs of LGBTQ Twitter Users" was saved.<br />
<br />
<br />
Evaluation of the Contribution<br />
------------------------------<br />
Overall organization and clarity of proposed submission&nbsp;&nbsp;(20%): 4<br />
Explicit Engagement&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(30%): 6<br />
Thematic relevance&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (10%): 6<br />
Statement of Purpose and Framework&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (20%): 7<br />
Contribution&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (20%): 6<br />
Total points (out of 100)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : 58<br />
<br />
<br />
Comments for the Authors<br />
------------------------<br />
The authors listed a lot of things they intend doing but unable to show evidence of how they would achieve that. The clarity of purpose in this research is obvious, but the methodology is questionable. I would advice that the authors should reduce their research objectives and give a detailed description of the tools to be used for their data mining.&nbsp;&nbsp;I strongly believe that a sentiment analysis using social media as the source of data requires some procedure to be able to defend the validity of one&#39;s finding.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Best,<br />
Your DH2020 organizers.<br />
<br />
<span style="color:#888;">-- <br />
Digital Humanities Conference 2020<br />
<a href='https://dh2020.adho.org/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>https://dh2020.adho.org/</a><br />
<a href='https://www.&#x63;&#x6F;&#x6E;&#x66;&#x74;&#x6F;&#x6F;&#x6C;&#x2E;&#x70;&#x72;&#x6F;/dh2020/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>https://www.&#x63;&#x6F;&#x6E;&#x66;&#x74;&#x6F;&#x6F;&#x6C;&#x2E;&#x70;&#x72;&#x6F;/dh2020/</a><br />
</span></tt></body></html>



--b1_2c025909a8fd5ef5601a057a0579e94d--